Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Duke Charges to be Dropped
The woman initially said the three raped her in a bathroom, but the rape charges were dropped in December after she told prosecutors she could no longer testify that she had been penetrated with a penis, one of the defining factors of rape under North Carolina law. In addition, two DNA tests have found no evidence linking any of the three men to their 28-year-old accuser.
Well after months of dragging these kids names through the shit the rape charges are on the cusp of being dropped. I like the way that CNN.com presents things. Their argument is one of semantics; "...she could no longer testify that she had been penetrated with a penis..." What the fuck does that mean? It clearly implies that the boys did something else when it should read: "College students exonerated, Lying Whore Held Accountable"
-BF
Excerpt: CNN.com
Monday, April 9, 2007
PodCast
Get ready...I, BarrelsForward along w/ Kievsky and possibly a few others will be recording a PodCast for distribution on this blog, and possibly VNN.COM
We have a boatload of current events both regional and national that we can't wait to get to!
-BF
We have a boatload of current events both regional and national that we can't wait to get to!
-BF
Monday, April 2, 2007
Inefficacy of Persuasion
I’ve often wondered why decent White people are so apt to sit silent while egregious injustices are visited upon them at the hands of the kikes. Then I think back to my unenlightened years of docile servitude; if it had not been for a dear friend I fear I may have been lost forever. We White Nationalists forget that people that still have their blinders firmly in place have a frightening awakening ahead of them. Sometimes the fear is so great that they may call you an epithet from the jewish lexicon of defamation and sometimes they may write you off entirely…and we want to avoid this at all costs. What we have to make certain is that our methods are refined and scholarly so that we can avoid alienating potential White Nationalists.
I am writing this because I heard Dietrich on FTL Friday discussing methods of solicitation and information dispersal that do not send our people running for the hills. I draw from my own introduction to White Nationalism, which was an incremental process that involved a fair amount of reading. When talking to a non WN White I always reference MacDonald’s Trilogy of work on the jewish question, it is methodically annotated and above all fascinating. The reason why I suggest this as a primer for Whites is that it establishes a contextual framework upon which subsequent information can be amassed. After MacDonald I usher them over to VNN immediately so that they can begin getting unfiltered news – this is an integral step. *
Pulling the potential White Nationalist away from the idiot box is very important. Once the blinders are removed some TV is tolerable (and I stress the word SOME), but most WN’s usually lose interest quickly because they understand the mainstream media for what it is: a massive mechanism for pacification. I suggest that they immerse themselves in VNN’s rich tapestry of broadcast alternatives like FTL and GoyFire…the chances are high that they’ll identify with at least one if not all of the broadcast hosts (I know I enjoy and listen to all of them).
Another important thing to remember is that time is essential. The person needs time to absorb and process the information, now some may do this in a hasty fashion which is excellent, but we should not discount those whose realization is somewhat delayed – they are White and they deserve the information we have. If the above methodology of introduction does not take and the person enjoys being a cog then there may be little hope. We also have to understand that some people love being servant dogs and if that is their wish then we are greater for weeding them out. So in summary I suggest a gradual process as a litmus test, if they fail then there are more out there that may be less thickheaded.
*Also…if they’re truly inquisitive suggest anything by Germar Rudolph. His astoundingly clear and heavily annotated works are some of the most jaw-dropping pieces of prose I’ve ever read. For pure statistical analysis I suggest simply glancing at crime stats from the Dept. of Justice…the data is easily accessible and allows the reader to draw objective non-jewed conclusions.
-BF
I am writing this because I heard Dietrich on FTL Friday discussing methods of solicitation and information dispersal that do not send our people running for the hills. I draw from my own introduction to White Nationalism, which was an incremental process that involved a fair amount of reading. When talking to a non WN White I always reference MacDonald’s Trilogy of work on the jewish question, it is methodically annotated and above all fascinating. The reason why I suggest this as a primer for Whites is that it establishes a contextual framework upon which subsequent information can be amassed. After MacDonald I usher them over to VNN immediately so that they can begin getting unfiltered news – this is an integral step. *
Pulling the potential White Nationalist away from the idiot box is very important. Once the blinders are removed some TV is tolerable (and I stress the word SOME), but most WN’s usually lose interest quickly because they understand the mainstream media for what it is: a massive mechanism for pacification. I suggest that they immerse themselves in VNN’s rich tapestry of broadcast alternatives like FTL and GoyFire…the chances are high that they’ll identify with at least one if not all of the broadcast hosts (I know I enjoy and listen to all of them).
Another important thing to remember is that time is essential. The person needs time to absorb and process the information, now some may do this in a hasty fashion which is excellent, but we should not discount those whose realization is somewhat delayed – they are White and they deserve the information we have. If the above methodology of introduction does not take and the person enjoys being a cog then there may be little hope. We also have to understand that some people love being servant dogs and if that is their wish then we are greater for weeding them out. So in summary I suggest a gradual process as a litmus test, if they fail then there are more out there that may be less thickheaded.
*Also…if they’re truly inquisitive suggest anything by Germar Rudolph. His astoundingly clear and heavily annotated works are some of the most jaw-dropping pieces of prose I’ve ever read. For pure statistical analysis I suggest simply glancing at crime stats from the Dept. of Justice…the data is easily accessible and allows the reader to draw objective non-jewed conclusions.
-BF
Monday, March 26, 2007
Personal Reflections of a Young White Nationalist
The classroom was somber. Many students shuffled in and quickly found their seats. Some would read the newspaper and others would speak among themselves. I didn’t have the luxury of knowing anybody in the class so I kept to myself and listened to music. The teacher walked in, he was an African American man in his mid to late forties, and he put a compact disc in the classroom media system. Suddenly the speakers eructed with the abrasive improvisational melodies of some obscure jazz musician. I put my cd player on pause and tried for a brief second to listen to the boisterous cacophony…needless to say I quickly returned to my own musical selection. This was the first day of White Racism, a sociology seminar offered at the University of {DELETED}.
At the beginning of the semester I had painted myself into a corner in terms what I could take and what I could not take. I needed to fill a W or “Writing” requirement and this particular class fit the bill. I would like to mention that at this time I was not a White Nationalist and I was firmly entrenched in typical Conservatism. It was probably due to some self-deprecating jewish notion implanted in my subconscious but I felt that I needed to “expand my horizons” and thusly decided to enroll in the seminar.
Anyway…the class began and the professor started to rattle off his confused mission statement. He began by drawing to our attention the disparity between blacks and Whites. He pointed out obvious constants like poverty, criminality, sexually transmitted diseases, and violence among a litany of other problems befalling the black community. I was captivated for I had noticed the severe differentiation between Whites and blacks and his lecture was giving me the other side of the story, or so I thought. After reading through a laundry list of problems he began to address their casual nature. This is where my curiosity turned almost immediately into blind rage for what followed was a semester long tirade about the injustices visited upon the black “community” by Whites.
The teacher also peddled his own books that included: White Racism, and Racist America – the latter being co-authored by a White sell out. You can find these books online I am sure. It was overt brainwashing plain and simple. Our final paper was to be on a personal experience about racism. He made a crack about how the White students would have to do some digging because it was unlikely that we would have encountered it in our lives. Like I mentioned earlier I had not read any White Nationalist literature yet and I was an established Conservative. So I scoured my brain trying to conjure up a topic for the paper. All that came to mind was how hostile blacks had treated me in the past, in high school and at college. I recalled when a Jamaican man in NYC followed a friend and I about 2 blocks begging for money and when we informed him that we didn’t have any he replied “Fuck you both, you White pieces of shit!” More memories began to flood my cerebrum… I thought back to my high-school experiences and the times that black students would give rousing anti-White speeches on MLK day (yes, you heard right…my high school had mandatory attendance on MLK). After hours of pondering I could not for a second name anything that was "racist" in my professor’s understanding of the word. Of course this was his intent. So, what did I do? I made up some bullshit. My paper was 100% bullshit. I catered to what I though this yardie wanted to hear and what did it get me? It got me an A.
It was shortly thereafter that I met a professor at the school who was a WN. He was casual at first when he broached WN topics of conversation but he quickly figured out that I was a misguided young White. One of the first things he asked me about was the etymology of my birth name. I replied that I was given my first name for two reasons: it represents both my German and Polish ancestry. He asked me if I was proud of my background. I was not sure where he was going with his line of questioning but it soon became clear. I mentioned to him the White Racism class I had taken the preceding semester and he shook his head, his facial expression was one of astonishment and disappointment. He pointed out the double standard that I was failing to conceptualize between black racial solidarity and White racial solidarity. The latter having none whilst the formers’ is so glaringly overt and over represented.
The next step he took was slowly introducing me to the idea of the jewish question. At first I recoiled when he broached the topic. I responded by laughing it off and saying: “Yeah, yeah…that is what everybody says.” Then over a period of a few months I opened my eyes a bit more. He told me to look at professor MacDonald’s body of work on the jews, which was in my school library. As I began to devour more information my hunger for the truth expanded exponentially. At first it was troublesome. If the White Nationalists were correct in their assertions the whole world as I knew it was a massive fallacy. So I read more.
What my WN professor told me to do was ask “Why.” The more you ask why the more likely you are to discover the truth behind the massive collection of lies. It worked. I was hooked. Through the context of White Nationalism I had developed a new taste for knowledge. I wasn’t bored to tears like in most of my collegiate seminars, instead I was furiously devouring essays by amazing White men like Richard Wagner and MacDonald. It was amazing! I was actually getting answers…answers that I never got from traditional or jewed-Conservatism. I can truly say that I owe my awakening to my professor and I am forever indebted to his honesty and Aryan benevolence.
At the beginning of the semester I had painted myself into a corner in terms what I could take and what I could not take. I needed to fill a W or “Writing” requirement and this particular class fit the bill. I would like to mention that at this time I was not a White Nationalist and I was firmly entrenched in typical Conservatism. It was probably due to some self-deprecating jewish notion implanted in my subconscious but I felt that I needed to “expand my horizons” and thusly decided to enroll in the seminar.
Anyway…the class began and the professor started to rattle off his confused mission statement. He began by drawing to our attention the disparity between blacks and Whites. He pointed out obvious constants like poverty, criminality, sexually transmitted diseases, and violence among a litany of other problems befalling the black community. I was captivated for I had noticed the severe differentiation between Whites and blacks and his lecture was giving me the other side of the story, or so I thought. After reading through a laundry list of problems he began to address their casual nature. This is where my curiosity turned almost immediately into blind rage for what followed was a semester long tirade about the injustices visited upon the black “community” by Whites.
The teacher also peddled his own books that included: White Racism, and Racist America – the latter being co-authored by a White sell out. You can find these books online I am sure. It was overt brainwashing plain and simple. Our final paper was to be on a personal experience about racism. He made a crack about how the White students would have to do some digging because it was unlikely that we would have encountered it in our lives. Like I mentioned earlier I had not read any White Nationalist literature yet and I was an established Conservative. So I scoured my brain trying to conjure up a topic for the paper. All that came to mind was how hostile blacks had treated me in the past, in high school and at college. I recalled when a Jamaican man in NYC followed a friend and I about 2 blocks begging for money and when we informed him that we didn’t have any he replied “Fuck you both, you White pieces of shit!” More memories began to flood my cerebrum… I thought back to my high-school experiences and the times that black students would give rousing anti-White speeches on MLK day (yes, you heard right…my high school had mandatory attendance on MLK). After hours of pondering I could not for a second name anything that was "racist" in my professor’s understanding of the word. Of course this was his intent. So, what did I do? I made up some bullshit. My paper was 100% bullshit. I catered to what I though this yardie wanted to hear and what did it get me? It got me an A.
It was shortly thereafter that I met a professor at the school who was a WN. He was casual at first when he broached WN topics of conversation but he quickly figured out that I was a misguided young White. One of the first things he asked me about was the etymology of my birth name. I replied that I was given my first name for two reasons: it represents both my German and Polish ancestry. He asked me if I was proud of my background. I was not sure where he was going with his line of questioning but it soon became clear. I mentioned to him the White Racism class I had taken the preceding semester and he shook his head, his facial expression was one of astonishment and disappointment. He pointed out the double standard that I was failing to conceptualize between black racial solidarity and White racial solidarity. The latter having none whilst the formers’ is so glaringly overt and over represented.
The next step he took was slowly introducing me to the idea of the jewish question. At first I recoiled when he broached the topic. I responded by laughing it off and saying: “Yeah, yeah…that is what everybody says.” Then over a period of a few months I opened my eyes a bit more. He told me to look at professor MacDonald’s body of work on the jews, which was in my school library. As I began to devour more information my hunger for the truth expanded exponentially. At first it was troublesome. If the White Nationalists were correct in their assertions the whole world as I knew it was a massive fallacy. So I read more.
What my WN professor told me to do was ask “Why.” The more you ask why the more likely you are to discover the truth behind the massive collection of lies. It worked. I was hooked. Through the context of White Nationalism I had developed a new taste for knowledge. I wasn’t bored to tears like in most of my collegiate seminars, instead I was furiously devouring essays by amazing White men like Richard Wagner and MacDonald. It was amazing! I was actually getting answers…answers that I never got from traditional or jewed-Conservatism. I can truly say that I owe my awakening to my professor and I am forever indebted to his honesty and Aryan benevolence.
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Amazing Video
I am new so I missed this video...but holy shit!
http://vanguardnewsnetwork.com/download/cobb/cobbkingston2.mov
Craig Cobb, you are one brave Aryan and we thank you for it!
-BF
http://vanguardnewsnetwork.com/download/cobb/cobbkingston2.mov
Craig Cobb, you are one brave Aryan and we thank you for it!
-BF
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Monday, March 19, 2007
Jewish Deviance
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17577691/
Check out that link. File under: Jewish diplomat / Perverse / Violent Abhorrent Behavior
Check out that link. File under: Jewish diplomat / Perverse / Violent Abhorrent Behavior
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)